A four-day week for local government: value for money and public innovation
15th April 2026
REPORT | Rob Calvert Jump, Luiz Garcia
Report summary:
Following South Cambridgeshire District Council’s move to a four-day week and growing scrutiny of reduced working hours at the local level from national government, this briefing establishes that South Cambridgeshire is not an ‘exceptional’ case – but a ‘typical’ local council – and calculates the savings that could be made were its four-day week replicated around the UK.
• South Cambridgeshire District Council saved £371,500 on an annual basis as a result of its move to shorter working hours. This was attributed to reducing its reliance on agency staff and temporary workers.
• As there were just under 750 employees at South Cambridgeshire at the conclusion of its trial, this implies a saving of around £500 per employee per year.
• The briefing finds that South Cambridgeshire can be considered ‘typical’ of two-tier district council in England in terms of three crucial factors that contributed towards the financial savings it made moving to a four-day week:
• the percentage of the local population employed by the local authority.
• the percentage of local authority workers that are casually or temporarily employed.
• agency staffing spend as a percentage of total staffing spend.
• If every lower-tier council in England moved to a four-day week, and followed the example of ‘typical’ South Cambridgeshire’, the savings would be approximately £38 million per year.
• If every local authority in the United Kingdom moved to a four-day week, the total saving would be around £1 billion per year.